Ok. I realized that I need somethin’ more confortable than dwm to work, test and develop. I also realized that a full desktop evinronment is what I need.
I’ve ever been a kde lover, but I didn’t like lasts decisions made by team and mainly the lastest releases (based on eyecandy and not on really useful features).
So, considering I was looking for an elegant and fast evinronment, I decided to install xfce.
Ta-da! No xfce on gentoo/freebsd 7.0. Or better, no xfce4 for now. The problem is related to xfce-base/xfce4-session., that depends on games-misc/fortune-mod. Fortune-mod, itself, doesn’t compile due a problem related to librecode. Talking w/ Diego “Flameeyes” Petteno`, he told me that librecode isn’t well written, and to solve that compilation problem I’ve to edit librecode source code ( the idea is that librecode must have in its _LIBADD also $(LTLIBINTL) ). However this could be so difficult and it couldn’t give any results. There are also two alternatives ways to seek: I can remove fortune-mod as dependency (uhm, not so elegant). Or I can use libiconv instead of librecode for fortune-mod. I’m working on that, and [equilibrium] from #gentoo-it gave me a patch that he found surfing the web, but it must be adapted to work.
About testing, I requested keyword ~x86-fbsd for gnome-jabber, screenie ( :* ) , gnome-mud and xchat-gnome, I hope to see it soon in the main tree because these are packages used from a lots of users.
Finally, about real life, I discovered that insomnia is stronger than me, and during last night I didn’t sleep. However, I opened a flick account, and I created a new amazon wishlist
You can find it here, feel free to donate something if you want.
Cheers, dav
If you add fortune to package.provided, you should be able to install xfce4-session, since fortune is just a runtime dependency to display a ‘fortune of the day’.
Comment by Mark Kowarsky — August 2, 2008 @ 12:27 am
Yeah, Mark I know this, and I explained it in my post as you can see. But I’m looking for an elegant way to solve the problem, and put a package in package.provided isn’t , don’t you think so ?
Comment by dav_it — August 2, 2008 @ 12:32 am